The conjectured maximal-sink-set formula for Hessenberg cohomology coefficients

About 9 years old · traced to

Let h:[n]→[n]h:[n]\to[n] be a Hessenberg function, and let Γh\Gamma_h be its associated graph. Let m=m(Γh)m=m(\Gamma_h) be the number of parts of the partition λ⊢n\lambda\vdash n. Let μ=(μ1,…,μm)\mu=(\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_m) be a partition of n−∣T∣n-|T| satisfying

λ=(μ1+1,μ2+1,…,μm+1).\lambda=(\mu_1+1,\mu_2+1,\ldots,\mu_m+1).

For a maximal sink set T∈SKm(Γh)T\in\mathrm{SK}_m(\Gamma_h), let deg⁡(T)\deg(T) be its degree and let cμ,jTc^T_{\mu,j} denote the corresponding coefficient for the smaller Hessenberg variety. Maximal-sink-set coefficient formula. For every i≥0i\geq0,

cλ,i=∑T∈SKm(Γh)cμ,i−deg⁡(T)T.c_{\lambda,i}=\sum_{T\in\mathrm{SK}_m(\Gamma_h)}c^T_{\mu,i-\deg(T)}.

The formula is proposed in the paper's section on the general case. The preceding induction proves the analogous non-negativity result only for abelian Hessenberg functions, so this general formula remains conjectural in the source context.

References

Primary source

Megumi Harada and Martha Precup, “The cohomology of abelian Hessenberg varieties and the Stanley-Stembridge conjecture”, arXiv:1709.06736 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.