Faulhuber's rotational invariance conjecture for Weyl–Heisenberg frames

About 9 years old · traced to

Let obreakϕ∈L2(R) obreak\boldsymbol{\textstyle\frac{}{}} \phi\in L^2(\mathbb{R}). Write WϕW\phi for its Wigner transform, let Λ\Lambda be a lattice in phase space, let G(ϕ,RΛ)\mathcal{G}(\phi,R\Lambda) denote the associated Weyl–Heisenberg frame system, and let R∈SO(2,R)R\in SO(2,\mathbb{R}) act on the lattice. A function is a Hermite function if it is one of the Hermite functions in L2(R)L^2(\mathbb{R}).

Rotational invariance conjecture. The following are equivalent:

  1. ϕ\phi is a Hermite function.
  2. WϕW\phi is rotation-invariant.
  3. The frames G(ϕ,RΛ)\mathcal{G}(\phi,R\Lambda) possess the same frame bounds for all R∈SO(2,R)R\in SO(2,\mathbb{R}).

This conjecture characterizes Hermite functions through rotational invariance of their Wigner transforms and through invariance of Weyl–Heisenberg frame bounds. The one-dimensional rotational invariance of Hermite functions motivates it, but the source gives no resolution of the equivalence.

References

Primary source

Markus Faulhuber, Maurice A. de Gosson and David Rottensteiner, “Gaussian Distributions and Phase Space Weyl–Heisenberg Frames”, arXiv:1708.01551 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.