Multiplicative separability of the positive linear functional contrast

At least 8 years old · documented by

Let AA be a real-valued positive definite operator representing an attribute, let MM represent the action of a mechanism, and let UU be a unitary operator diagonalizing AA. Let G\mathcal{G} be the generic subgroup of operators, and define the positive linear functional contrast by

C(A)=⟨A,e⟩,C(A)=\langle A,e\rangle,

where ee is the identity operator. The action is mA=MAM∗mA=MAM^*, where ∗* denotes complex conjugation.

Multiplicative separability conjecture. For all positive definite attributes AA, whenever UU belongs to G\mathcal{G}, the contrast is multiplicatively separable and

⟨C⟩m,x=C(MM∗)C(A).\langle C\rangle_{m,x}=C(MM^*)C(A).

Such a multiplicative form for the contrast would support the derivation of a forward-backward inequality under one additional assumption. The source does not provide evidence that the conjecture has been resolved.

References

Primary source

Michel Besserve, Naji Shajarisales, Bernhard Schölkopf and Dominik Janzing, “Group invariance principles for causal generative models”, arXiv:1705.02212 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.