Zero-mode criterion for fusion of boundary defects

Let Ai\mathcal{A}_i and Aj\mathcal{A}_j be Lagrangian algebras, and let τij\tau_{ij} denote a boundary defect between them. Let tit_i be a simple object of the boundary fusion category Rep(Ai)\operatorname{Rep}(\mathcal{A}_i), and write the lifting of tit_i in terms of bulk anyons aa using the fusion coefficients natin_a^{t_i}, so that nati0n_a^{t_i}\neq 0 precisely when aa occurs in the lifting of tit_i. A bulk anyon aa is a zero mode of τij\tau_{ij} when it belongs to AiAj\mathcal{A}_i\otimes\mathcal{A}_j, meaning that there exist aiAia_i\in\mathcal{A}_i and ajAja_j\in\mathcal{A}_j with aaiaja\in a_i\otimes a_j. Zero-mode criterion. The simple object tit_i appears in the fusion product

τijτji\tau_{ij}\otimes\tau_{ji}

if and only if every bulk anyon aa in its lifting, equivalently every aa with nati0n_a^{t_i}\neq 0, is a zero mode of τij\tau_{ij} or τji\tau_{ji}. This criterion is a heuristic proposed for determining the coefficients in the defect fusion decomposition. It concerns boundary defects between distinct Lagrangian algebras and is intended to describe which boundary excitations occur when the intermediate boundary segment is shrunk; the source does not establish its general validity.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Iris Cong, Meng Cheng and Zhenghan Wang, “On Defects Between Gapped Boundaries in Two-Dimensional Topological Phases of Matter”, arXiv:1703.03564 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.