A lower-bound conjecture for the 2-adic complexity of LSB sequences of p-ary m-sequences
A lower-bound conjecture for the 2-adic complexity of LSB sequences of p-ary m-sequences
Let be any odd prime, let be a positive integer, and set . Let be the LSB sequence of a -ary -sequence of order , and let denote a constant depending only on and not on . The 2-adic complexity conjecture. The 2-adic complexity of is bounded below by
and this lower bound is larger than when . The result would show that these LSB sequences have 2-adic complexity exceeding half their period, supporting their resistance to rational approximation attacks; the stated bound is established in the paper for several specific primes, while the general assertion for every odd prime remains open.
Progress summary
Partial calculations support the conjecture, but no general proof or counterexample has appeared, so the question remains open for arbitrary odd primes.
Sun, Wang, Yan, and Zhao proposed the conjecture in 2017: the LSB sequences of odd-prime -ary -sequences should have -adic complexity exceeding half their period by a prime-dependent linear margin. The paper explicitly says that a complete proof for every odd prime was not obtained.
Known results
- Explicit lower bounds were proved for several primes, including , and .
- For , the bounds have main term , hence exceed for .
- Similar methods and calculations were reported for , and , but not extended to all odd primes.
- The corresponding 2020 publication continues to label the all-prime assertion a conjecture rather than a theorem.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is established only for selected primes, while the asserted lower bound for every odd prime remains open; no public proof, counterexample, or claimed AI solution was found.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Yuhua Sun, Qiuyan Wang, Tongjiang Yan and Chun'e Zhao, “Autocorrelation and Lower Bound on the 2-Adic Complexity of LSB Sequence of p-ary m-Sequence”, arXiv:1702.00822 (2020).
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.