Endpoint behavior of optimal p-norm spectral-partition energies

Let Ω\Omega be a domain, let kk be a positive integer, let Lk,p(Ω)\mathfrak L_{k,p}(\Omega) be the optimal pp-norm energy of a kk-partition, and let p(Ω,k)p_{\infty}(\Omega,k) denote the parameter introduced in the source. Endpoint-energy conjecture. One has

p(Ω,k){1,},p_{\infty}(\Omega,k)\in\{1,\infty\},

and either Lk,p(Ω)\mathfrak L_{k,p}(\Omega) is constant with respect to pp or it is strictly increasing with respect to pp. Moreover, numerical simulations suggest that p(Ω,k)=1p_{\infty}(\Omega,k)=1 if one of the following holds: Ω\Omega is a disk and k{2,3,4,5}k\in\{2,3,4,5\}; Ω\Omega is a square and k{2,4}k\in\{2,4\}; or Ω\Omega is an equilateral triangle and k=n(n+1)/2k=n(n+1)/2 with n1n\geq1. The claim summarizes numerical evidence concerning how the optimal energy changes with pp; it is not presented with a proof, and the source does not provide a general resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Virginie Bonnaillie-Noel and Beniamin Bogosel, “Minimal Partitions for p-norms of Eigenvalues”, arXiv:1612.07296 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.