D-equivalence implies L-equivalence for simply connected varieties

Let XX and YY be smooth projective simply connected varieties. Write D(X)\mathbb{D}(X) for the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves on XX, and let L=[A1]\mathbb L=[\mathbb A^1] be the class of the affine line in the Grothendieck ring K0(Var/k)K_0(\operatorname{Var}/\Bbbk). The varieties XX and YY are L-equivalent when ([X][Y])Lr=0([X]-[Y])\mathbb L^r=0 for some integer r0r\geq 0. D–L equivalence conjecture. If

D(X)D(Y),\mathbb{D}(X)\cong\mathbb{D}(Y),

then there is a nonnegative integer r0r\geq 0 such that

([X][Y])Lr=0.([X]-[Y])\mathbb L^r=0.

In other words, D-equivalence of varieties implies their L-equivalence.

The conjecture is motivated by examples of derived-equivalent Calabi–Yau threefolds whose classes become equal after multiplication by a power of L\mathbb L. Simple connectedness is essential: the source notes that derived-equivalent abelian varieties need not be L-equivalent. The conjecture's resolution status is not specified in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Alexander Kuznetsov and Evgeny Shinder, “Grothendieck ring of varieties, D- and L-equivalence, and families of quadrics”, arXiv:1612.07193 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.