The amenability necessity conjecture for crossed-product transference

About 10 years old · traced to

Let Γ\Gamma be a discrete group, let θ:G→Aut⁡(M)\theta:G\to\operatorname{Aut}(\mathcal{M}) be a trace-preserving action, and let p≠2p\ne2. Suppose there is a complete isometry

jp:Lp(M⋊θΓ)→jp∏α,ULp(M ⊗‾ B(ℓ2Γ))j_p:L_p(\mathcal{M}\rtimes_\theta\Gamma)\xrightarrow{\quad j_p\quad}\prod_{\alpha,\mathcal{U}}L_p(\mathcal{M}\,\overline{\otimes}\,\mathcal{B}(\ell_2\Gamma))

satisfying

jp(Id⁡⋊Tm)=(Id⁡⊗Mm)α,Ujp.j_p(\operatorname{Id}\rtimes T_m)=(\operatorname{Id}\otimes M_m)^{\alpha,\mathcal{U}}j_p.

Amenability necessity conjecture. Under these assumptions, the action θ\theta is amenable. This conjecture would show that amenability is necessary for the transference results considered in the paper; the authors note that this necessity is not known and is suggested by related transference results.

References

Primary source

A. M. González-Pérez, “Crossed-Product Extensions of L_p-Bounds for Amenable Actions”, arXiv:1611.08486 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.