The combinatorial non-crossing-sums inequality
The combinatorial non-crossing-sums inequality
Let be odd natural numbers. For each , let be distinct real numbers, and set . For two finite pairs of real numbers, call their sums non-crossing when the two sums of one choice and the two sums of the other choice do not alternate in order. Assume:
- For each and of the same parity, the pairs and have non-crossing sums.
- For of the same parity, the three pairs , , and have non-crossing sums.
Combinatorial formulation conjecture. Then
This is an almost purely combinatorial formulation of the symmetric area inequality. It is stated as an open conjecture in the paper.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Terence Tao, “An integration approach to the Toeplitz square peg problem”, arXiv:1611.07441 (2017).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.