The combinatorial non-crossing-sums inequality
Let be odd natural numbers. For each , let be distinct real numbers, and set . For two finite pairs of real numbers, call their sums non-crossing when the two sums of one choice and the two sums of the other choice do not alternate in order. Assume:
- For each and of the same parity, the pairs and have non-crossing sums.
- For of the same parity, the three pairs , , and have non-crossing sums.
Combinatorial formulation conjecture. Then
This is an almost purely combinatorial formulation of the symmetric area inequality. It is stated as an open conjecture in the paper.
References
Primary source
Terence Tao, “An integration approach to the Toeplitz square peg problem”, arXiv:1611.07441 (2017).
Progress summary
Never refreshed
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.