The Q-graded Kontsevich–Penner matrix-model conjecture for open intersection numbers

Let M(g,b),k,l\mathcal{M}_{(g,b),k,l} be the moduli space of Riemann surfaces with boundary of genus gg, with bb boundary components, kk boundary marked points, and ll interior marked points, and let \widebarM(g,b),k,l\widebar{\mathcal{M}}_{(g,b),k,l} be its compactification by nodal surfaces. Let F(g,b),nF_{(g,b),n} denote the generating function of descendant integrals over this compactification, and let {Td}\{T_d\} and {Sf}\{S_f\} be related to the KP times by Td=(2d+1)!!t2d+1T_d=(2d+1)!!t_{2d+1} and Sf=2f+1(f+1)!t2f+2S_f=2^{f+1}(f+1)!t_{2f+2}. For a matrix Λ\Lambda, define tk(Λ)=1kTrΛkt_k(\Lambda)=\frac{1}{k}\operatorname{Tr}\Lambda^{-k}. Q-graded Kontsevich–Penner conjecture. Assuming that the constructions of these moduli spaces and intersection integrals can be made rigorous, one has

τQ(t1(Λ),t2(Λ),)=exp(g,b,n2g+b2QbF(g,b),n).\tau_Q(t_1(\Lambda),t_2(\Lambda),\ldots)=\exp\Bigl(\sum_{g,b,n}\hbar^{2g+b-2}Q^bF_{(g,b),n}\Bigr).

The parameter QQ is intended to distinguish contributions from surfaces with different numbers of boundary components. The source describes this as a conjectural refinement suggested by topological recursion and gives no resolution status; the claim is conditional on making the underlying constructions rigorous.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Brad Safnuk, “Combinatorial models for moduli spaces of open Riemann surfaces”, arXiv:1609.07226 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.