Optimality of the partition-matching exponent for set-partition avoidance

From papers

Let π\pi be a set partition. Denote by Bn(π)B_n(\pi) the number of set partitions of [n][n] avoiding π\pi, and let pm(π)\operatorname{pm}(\pi) be the partition-matching number of π\pi. Then the following bounds are conjectured to hold.

Partition-matching exponent conjecture.

  • Weak form:
limnlogBn(π)nlogn=11pm(π).\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\log B_n(\pi)}{n\log n}=1-\frac{1}{\operatorname{pm}(\pi)}.
  • Strong form: There exists a constant c2(π)c_2(\pi) such that
Bn(π)c2(π)nnn(11pm(π))B_n(\pi)\leq c_2(\pi)^n n^{n\left(1-\frac{1}{\operatorname{pm}(\pi)}\right)}

for all nn.

The lower bound with the same exponent is proved in the paper, while the conjecture concerns the matching upper bounds. The strong form implies the weak form when combined with the established lower bound; both are motivated by the failure of Alweiss's earlier exponent involving th(π)\operatorname{th}(\pi) when pm(π)>th(π)\operatorname{pm}(\pi)>\operatorname{th}(\pi).

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Benjamin Gunby, “Asymptotics of Pattern Avoidance in the Permutation-Tuple and Klazar Set Partition Settings”, arXiv:1609.06023 (2019).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.