The Pfister involution conjecture in characteristic two

Let (A,σ)(A,\sigma) be a central simple algebra of degree 2n2^n with orthogonal involution over a field FF of characteristic two. Suppose that σ\sigma is anisotropic. The involution σ\sigma is anisotropic when it is not isotropic, and (A,σ)(A,\sigma) is totally decomposable when it decomposes as a tensor product of quaternion algebras with involution. A field extension K/FK/F is a splitting field of AA when AKA_K is split, and an involution is metabolic when it satisfies the usual metabolicity condition. A bilinear Pfister form is a bilinear form obtained as a tensor product of binary bilinear forms of Pfister type. Then the following statements are equivalent:

Pfister involution conjecture.

  1. (A,σ)(A,\sigma) is totally decomposable.
  2. For every splitting field KK of AA, (A,σ)K(A,\sigma)_K is adjoint to a bilinear Pfister form.
  3. For every field extension L/FL/F, (A,σ)L(A,\sigma)_L is either anisotropic or metabolic.

This characteristic-two analogue replaces hyperbolicity by metabolicity for orthogonal involutions. The implications (1)(2)(1)\Rightarrow(2) and (1)(3)(1)\Rightarrow(3) were known, while the displayed equivalence was resolved by the cited results; in particular, the previously open reverse implications are no longer conjectural.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

A. -H. Nokhodkar, “Pfister involutions in characteristic two”, arXiv:1608.02730 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.