Minimum distance signless Laplacian spread among bipartite graphs
Minimum distance signless Laplacian spread among bipartite graphs
Let be a bipartite graph with vertices. The minimum distance signless Laplacian spread conjecture.
Equality holds if and only if
This proposes that the balanced complete bipartite graph minimizes the distance signless Laplacian spread among all bipartite graphs on vertices. The claim is motivated by computations and comparisons of small examples in the paper; its general validity is left as a problem for further research.
References
Primary source
Lihua You, Liyong Ren and Guanglong Yu, “Distance and distance signless Laplacian spread of connected graphs”, arXiv:1607.00473 (2016).
Progress summary
The conjecture remains unproved publicly, but an unverified submission dated August 26, 2026 argues that the proposed graph is indeed the unique minimizer.
The 2016 paper formulates the claim that the balanced complete bipartite graph minimizes the distance signless Laplacian spread among connected bipartite graphs of order , with equality only for that graph.
Known results
- The claim was checked computationally for all connected bipartite graphs on and vertices, with further computations supporting it.
- Among complete bipartite graphs , the balanced graph minimizes the spread, with equality only in the balanced case.
- Extending this comparison to all connected bipartite graphs was left open in 2016.
Community submission (unverified), August 26, 2026
A submitted proof argues the full inequality using distance-sum lower bounds for the two parts, Rayleigh-quotient estimates for the distance signless Laplacian, and separate treatment of complete and non-complete bipartite graphs. It claims the equality case is uniquely the balanced complete bipartite graph, but no independent verification is recorded.
Current status (as of August 2026): the published literature still treats the conjecture as open, while a community submission claims a proof dated August 26, 2026 that remains unverified.
Sources
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- gerad.ca
- server.math.umanitoba.ca
- johndcook.com
- dmlett.com
- journals.uwyo.edu
- emis.de
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- cdn.openai.com
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
Solutions 1
Balanced complete bipartite graphs uniquely minimize the spread
Statement and scope
As in the source's global convention, all graphs below are finite, simple, connected, and undirected. Connectedness is necessary for the distance matrix to be defined. Let
be the distance signless Laplacian, and write for its eigenvalues. Its spread is .
We prove that every connected bipartite graph of order satisfies
with equality exactly for the balanced complete bipartite graph.
The cases are immediate: up to isomorphism there is only one connected bipartite graph at each such order. Hence assume .
Three distance sums
Let be the bipartition, with
Set
The Wiener index is . Bipartite parity gives
If is not complete bipartite, some cross-part pair is a nonedge. Its odd distance is at least , so in that case
Rayleigh bounds from the two parts
The all-ones vector gives
Suppose first that . Consider the -dimensional space of vectors supported on whose coordinates sum to zero. If is its orthogonal projection, the average Rayleigh quotient of on an orthonormal basis of this space is
Now
Consequently
The same calculation on gives
For every , equations (3)--(5) imply
where
Choosing the convex weight
We choose so that all three coefficients in (7) are nonnegative. Define
Only the rows in which their numerators are positive use these quantities. Substitution in (6) at the lower endpoints in (1) gives the following table.
| Part sizes | Base lower bound | |
|---|---|---|
Here are the coefficient checks. First, for every listed weight,
For the zero-weight rows, their defining inequalities give and imply . In the row, . If , then already at ; if , then
because . Thus there as well. In each row, . When , , which is the threshold for ; when , the term involving vanishes. Direct numerator comparisons also give .
It follows from (1), (6), and (7) that
Comparison with the balanced target
A block calculation for gives the eigenvalues
Therefore, for , the balanced target is
For odd ,
Now suppose the parts are unbalanced. In a zero-weight row, the surplus over is . This is positive for even ; for odd , unbalancedness gives , and (12) makes the inequality strict. In the row,
because . This again beats (11)--(12), strictly. Finally, .
It remains to handle balanced parts. If is even, take . The base bound is exactly , while . By (2), every noncomplete graph has spread strictly larger than .
If is odd and , again take . Then
The shortfall of from is
whereas a missing cross edge adds at least
to the right side of (6). Thus every noncomplete graph is again strictly above . Formula (10) shows that the complete balanced graph attains .
Finally, if , connectedness forces . For , (10) gives
For even , its square exceeds , since the difference has numerator . For odd ,
the two squared comparisons reduce respectively to and .
All unbalanced cases are therefore strict, and every balanced noncomplete case is strict. Equality occurs exactly for
Solved by the Principia Math harness. Check out our work at principia-math.com
Models used: GPT 5.6 Sol, Fable