Conjecture on fluctuation regimes for the proportion of heads

From papers

Let pn[0,1]p_n\in [0,1] for n1n\ge 1, and let E(N,2)E(N,2) denote the quantity governing the covariance contribution in the variance formula

Var(SN)=N+2N2E(N,2).\operatorname{Var}(S_N)=N+2N^2E(N,2).

The proportion of heads is centered at 1/21/2.

Fluctuation-regime conjecture. (i) If E(N,2)=O(1/N)E(N,2)=\mathcal{O}(1/N) as NN\to\infty, then the proportion of heads obeys a central limit theorem. (ii) If E(N,2)=O(1/N)E(N,2)=\mathcal{O}(1/N) fails but E(N,2)=o(1)E(N,2)=o(1) holds, then there is a non-standard central limit theorem for the proportion: its fluctuation about 1/21/2 is larger than order N\sqrt{N}. (iii) If E(N,2)=o(1)E(N,2)=o(1) fails, then the weak law of large numbers is no longer valid for the proportion, which is not concentrated about 1/21/2.

The conjecture proposes a trichotomy linking the decay of the dependence term E(N,2)E(N,2) to central-limit and weak-law behavior. The source provides heuristic motivation and examples, but no resolution of the three assertions; the status is therefore open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Janos Englander and Stanislav Volkov, “Turning a coin over instead of tossing it”, arXiv:1606.03281 (2016).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.