Prasad's Ext-vanishing conjecture for generic representations of general linear groups

About 10 years old · traced to

Let FF be the underlying nonarchimedean local field, let nn be a positive integer, let π1\pi_1 be an irreducible generic representation of GL(n+1,F)GL(n+1,F), and let π2\pi_2 be an irreducible generic representation of GL(n,F)GL(n,F). The groups Ext⁡GL(n,F)i(π1,π2)\operatorname{Ext}^i_{GL(n,F)}(\pi_1,\pi_2) are taken in the category of smooth representations of GL(n,F)GL(n,F). Prasad's conjecture.

Ext⁡GL(n,F)i(π1,π2)=0\operatorname{Ext}^i_{GL(n,F)}(\pi_1,\pi_2)=0

for all i≥1i\geq 1. This conjecture concerns higher extension groups in the restriction from GL(n+1,F)GL(n+1,F) to GL(n,F)GL(n,F); the paper verifies it for representations that are locally nice at the relevant maximal ideal, while the general case is not resolved here.

References

Primary source

Kei Yuen Chan and Gordan Savin, “Bernstein-Zelevinsky derivatives, branching rules and Hecke algebras”, arXiv:1605.05130 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.