Oriented Knot Complement Conjecture

About 10 years old · traced to

Let MM be a closed oriented 33-manifold, and let K1K_1 and K2K_2 be knots in MM whose complements are homeomorphic by an orientation preserving homeomorphism and are not homeomorphic to S1×D2S^1\times D^2. Oriented Knot Complement Conjecture. The knots K1K_1 and K2K_2 are orientation preserving equivalent. This conjecture is stated as still open in general manifolds. It is motivated by the fact that knots in several classes of 33-manifolds are determined by their complements, while counterexamples with orientation reversing homeomorphic complements are known.

Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. The oriented knot complement conjecture

    Let K1K_1 and K2K_2 be knots in a closed, oriented 3-manifold MM, and suppose that their complements are homeomorphic by an orientation-preserving homeomorphism. Oriented knot complement conjecture. There is an orientation-preserving homeomorphism of MM taking K1K_1 to K2K_2. The source presents this as an equivalent form of the cosmetic surgery conjecture and gives no resolution.

    source: Steven A. Bleiler, Craig D. Hodgson and Jeffrey R. Weeks, “Cosmetic surgery on knots”, arXiv:math/9911247 (1999).

References

Primary source

Marc Kegel, “The Legendrian knot complement problem”, arXiv:1604.05196 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.