The Mumford--Tate conjecture for abelian varieties

From papers

Let AA be an abelian variety of dimension gg over a number field, and fix a prime \ell. Let GzarGSp2gG_\ell^{\rm zar}\subseteq \operatorname{GSp}_{2g} and G1,zarSp2gG_\ell^{1,\rm zar}\subseteq \operatorname{Sp}_{2g} be the Zariski closures of the corresponding d9d9\ell-adic Galois representations. Let MT(A)\operatorname{MT}(A) and Hg(A)\operatorname{Hg}(A) denote the Mumford--Tate and Hodge groups of AA. Mumford--Tate conjecture. The identity component of GzarG_\ell^{\rm zar} equals

MT(A)QQ;\operatorname{MT}(A)\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\mathbf{Q}_\ell;

equivalently, the identity component of G1,zarG_\ell^{1,\rm zar} equals

Hg(A)QQ.\operatorname{Hg}(A)\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\mathbf{Q}_\ell.

Deligne proved the corresponding inclusions, and the equalities are known for abelian varieties of dimension g3g\leq 3. In general the conjecture remains open; when true, it determines the identity component of the Sato--Tate group up to conjugacy.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Andrew V. Sutherland, “Sato-Tate Distributions”, arXiv:1604.01256 (2021).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.