The Mumford--Tate conjecture for abelian varieties

About 10 years old · traced to

Let AA be an abelian variety of dimension gg over a number field, and fix a prime ℓ\ell. Let Gℓzar⊆GSp⁡2gG_\ell^{\rm zar}\subseteq \operatorname{GSp}_{2g} and Gℓ1,zar⊆Sp⁡2gG_\ell^{1,\rm zar}\subseteq \operatorname{Sp}_{2g} be the Zariski closures of the corresponding d9ℓd9\ell-adic Galois representations. Let MT⁡(A)\operatorname{MT}(A) and Hg⁡(A)\operatorname{Hg}(A) denote the Mumford--Tate and Hodge groups of AA. Mumford--Tate conjecture. The identity component of GℓzarG_\ell^{\rm zar} equals

MT⁡(A)⊗QQℓ;\operatorname{MT}(A)\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\mathbf{Q}_\ell;

equivalently, the identity component of Gℓ1,zarG_\ell^{1,\rm zar} equals

Hg⁡(A)⊗QQℓ.\operatorname{Hg}(A)\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\mathbf{Q}_\ell.

Deligne proved the corresponding inclusions, and the equalities are known for abelian varieties of dimension g≤3g\leq 3. In general the conjecture remains open; when true, it determines the identity component of the Sato--Tate group up to conjugacy.

References

Primary source

Andrew V. Sutherland, “Sato-Tate Distributions”, arXiv:1604.01256 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.