Bobiński–Malicki conjecture on derived equivalences among the algebras A(p) and B(p,r)

At least 9 years old · documented by

For p∈Z≥0p \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}, p′∈Z≥1p' \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 1}, and r∈[0,p]r \in [0,p], let A(p)A(p) and B(p,r)B(p,r) be the algebras defined in the paper, and let Db(−){\mathcal D}^b(-) denote their bounded derived categories of finite-dimensional modules.

Bobiński–Malicki conjecture.

(a) For all p∈Z≥0p \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}, p′∈Z≥1p' \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 1}, and r∈[0,p]r \in [0,p],

Db(B(p,r))≆Db(A(p′)).{\mathcal D}^b(B(p,r)) \ncong {\mathcal D}^b(A(p')).

(b) If

Db(B(p,r))≅Db(B(p′,r′)),{\mathcal D}^b(B(p,r)) \cong {\mathcal D}^b(B(p',r')),

then p=p′p=p' and r=r′r=r'.

The conjecture asserts that distinct algebras in the families A(p)A(p) and B(p,r)B(p,r) are not derived equivalent. It was proved by Bobiński, building on earlier work of Amiot.

References

Primary source

Martin Kalck, “Derived categories of quasi-hereditary algebras and their derived composition series”, arXiv:1603.06490 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.