Bobiński–Malicki conjecture on derived equivalences among the algebras A(p) and B(p,r)

For pZ0p \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}, pZ1p' \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 1}, and r[0,p]r \in [0,p], let A(p)A(p) and B(p,r)B(p,r) be the algebras defined in the paper, and let Db(){\mathcal D}^b(-) denote their bounded derived categories of finite-dimensional modules.

Bobiński–Malicki conjecture.

(a) For all pZ0p \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}, pZ1p' \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 1}, and r[0,p]r \in [0,p],

Db(B(p,r))Db(A(p)).{\mathcal D}^b(B(p,r)) \ncong {\mathcal D}^b(A(p')).

(b) If

Db(B(p,r))Db(B(p,r)),{\mathcal D}^b(B(p,r)) \cong {\mathcal D}^b(B(p',r')),

then p=pp=p' and r=rr=r'.

The conjecture asserts that distinct algebras in the families A(p)A(p) and B(p,r)B(p,r) are not derived equivalent. It was proved by Bobiński, building on earlier work of Amiot.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Martin Kalck, “Derived categories of quasi-hereditary algebras and their derived composition series”, arXiv:1603.06490 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.