The Bias Conjecture for second moments in one-parameter elliptic-curve families

Let E:y2=x3+A(T)x+B(T)\mathcal{E}:y^2=x^3+A(T)x+B(T) be a family of elliptic curves over Q(T)\mathbb{Q}(T), with A(T),B(T)Z[T]A(T),B(T)\in\mathbb{Z}[T]. For the specialization EtE_t, let at(p)a_t(p) be its Fourier coefficient at pp, and define

A2(p)=1ptmodpat(p)2.A_2(p)=\frac{1}{p}\sum_{t\bmod p}a_t(p)^2.

Write the second moment in the form

A2(p)=p2+β3/2(p)p3/2+β1(p)p+β1/2(p)p1/2+β0(p),A_2(p)=p^2+\beta_{3/2}(p)p^{3/2}+\beta_1(p)p+\beta_{1/2}(p)p^{1/2}+\beta_0(p),

where each βr(p)\beta_r(p) is of order 11.

Bias Conjecture. For any such family, the largest lower-order term in the second moment that does not average to 00 is on average negative; equivalently, the first βr(p)\beta_r(p) term that does not average to zero has negative average.

Michel proved the leading estimate A2(p)=p2+O(p3/2)A_2(p)=p^2+O(p^{3/2}) for families with nonconstant jj-invariant, and the possible lower-order sizes are p3/2p^{3/2}, pp, p1/2p^{1/2}, and 11. The conjecture is supported by the families proved or numerically analyzed in the source and is intended to describe a family-dependent arithmetic bias.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Blake Mackall, Steven J. Miller, Christina Rapti, Caroline Turnage-Butterbaugh, Karl Winsor, with an appendix by Megumi Asada, Eva Fourakis, Steven J. Miller and Kevin Yang, “Some Results in the Theory of Low-lying Zeros: Determining the 1-level density, identifying the group symmetry and the arithmetic of moments of Satake parameters”, arXiv:1602.00972 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.