Kontsevich–Soibelman motivic integrality conjecture

Let A\mathcal{A} be a category satisfying conditions (7) and (8), let WW be its potential, and let ϕmot\phi^{mot} denote the motivic vanishing-cycle realization. For each dimension vector dNId\in\mathbb{N}^{\oplus I}, the motivic Donaldson–Thomas function DT(A,W(ϕmot))d\mathcal{DT}(\mathcal{A},W^*(\phi^{mot}))_d is defined in the localized Grothendieck group associated with the critical locus MdW\mathcal{M}^{W}_d. Motivic integrality conjecture. For all dimension vectors dNId\in\mathbb{N}^{\oplus I}, the element DT(A,W(ϕmot))d\mathcal{DT}(\mathcal{A},W^*(\phi^{mot}))_d lies in the image of

Kμ^(SchMdWft)L1/2Kμ^(SchMdWft)L1/2,(L1)1.\operatorname{K}^{\hat{\mu}}(\operatorname{Sch}^{ft}_{\mathcal{M}^{W}_d})\langle \mathbb{L}^{-1/2}\rangle^- \longrightarrow \operatorname{K}^{\hat{\mu}}(\operatorname{Sch}^{ft}_{\mathcal{M}^{W}_d})\langle \mathbb{L}^{-1/2},(\mathbb{L}-1)^{-1}\rangle^-.

This conjecture, attributed to M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, asserts motivic integrality: the Donaldson–Thomas functions can be realized without inverting L1\mathbb{L}-1 in the non-stacky motivic theory.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ben Davison and Sven Meinhardt, “Donaldson-Thomas theory for categories of homological dimension one with potential”, arXiv:1512.08898 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.