Rigidity conjecture for multicritical circle maps with the same signature

Let ff and gg be C3C^3 multicritical circle maps without periodic points. For a multicritical circle map ff with critical points ci=ci(f)c_i=c_i(f), 0inf10\leq i\leq n_f-1, irrational rotation number ρ(f)\rho(f), unique invariant Borel probability measure μf\mu_f, critical exponents sis_i, and λi=μf[ci,ci+1)\lambda_i=\mu_f[c_i,c_{i+1}) with cnf=c0c_{n_f}=c_0, its signature is the tuple

(ρ(f),nf;s0,s1,,snf1;λ0,λ1,,λnf1).(\rho(f),n_f;s_0,s_1,\ldots,s_{n_f-1};\lambda_0,\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_{n_f-1}).

Rigidity conjecture. If ff and gg have the same signature, then they are conjugate by a C1C^1 diffeomorphism. Moreover, if their common rotation number is of bounded type, then the conjugacy is C1+αC^{1+\alpha} for some universal α>0\alpha>0. The conjecture seeks differentiable rigidity beyond the quasisymmetric rigidity theorem, which requires the conjugacy to map corresponding critical points but does not require equal critical exponents. The C1C^1 statement was conjectured as sufficient for differentiability; the stronger real-analytic case has been proved through work of de Faria, de Melo, Yampolsky, and Khanin–Teplinsky, so the conjecture is solved in that case, while the stated C3C^3 formulation is not established by the supplied context.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Gabriela Estevez and Edson de Faria, “Real bounds and quasisymmetric rigidity of multicritical circle maps”, arXiv:1511.09056 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.