The stochastic diffusive behavior conjecture for the generalized Arnold example

About 11 years old · traced to

Let Hε=H0+εH1H_\varepsilon=H_0+\varepsilon H_1 be the Hamiltonian under consideration, let I∗∈RI^*\in\mathbb{R}, and let με(I∗)\mu^\varepsilon(I^*) be normalized Lebesgue measure on the prescribed neighborhood of (p,q,I∗,φ,t)(p,q,I^*,\varphi,t). Write ΠI\Pi_I for projection onto the II-component and set

tε=s ε−2log⁡1ε.t_\varepsilon=s\,\varepsilon^{-2}\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}.

For a diffusion process I∙I_\bullet, denote its drift by b(I)b(I) and its variance by σ(I)\sigma(I).

The stochastic diffusive behavior conjecture. For a generic perturbation εH1(⋅)\varepsilon H_1(\cdot), there are smooth functions b(I)b(I) and σ(I)>0\sigma(I)>0, depending only on H1H_1 and H0H_0, such that for every s>0s>0 the distribution

ΠI(ϕ∗tεμε(I∗))\Pi_I\bigl(\phi^{t_\varepsilon}_*\mu^\varepsilon(I^*)\bigr)

converges weakly as ε→0\varepsilon\to0 to the distribution of IsI_s, where I∙I_\bullet is the diffusion process with drift bb and variance σ\sigma, starting from I0=I∗I_0=I^*.

This conjecture predicts that the slow action variable exhibits diffusive behavior on the logarithmically corrected time scale ε−2log⁡(1/ε)\varepsilon^{-2}\log(1/\varepsilon) for generic perturbations. The diffusion coefficients are expected to depend only on the unperturbed and perturbing Hamiltonians; the statement remains unproved in the source.

References

Primary source

Vadim Kaloshin, Jianlu Zhang and Ke Zhang, “Normally Hyperbolic Invariant Laminations and diffusive behaviour for the generalized Arnold example away from resonances”, arXiv:1511.04835 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.