Parametrised T-duality trivialisation conjecture for the bulk-boundary correspondence
Let be the parameter space, let , , and be the twisting components on , and write for the principal -bundle over with Chern class , with projection and parametrised deformation determined by . Choose a subgroup decomposition , let be the inclusion, and let , , and denote the corresponding restricted data. The bulk-boundary map is the Pimsner–Voiculescu boundary map
Parametrised T-duality trivialisation conjecture. The diagram
\xymatrix{ K^j(X\times \mathbb T^n,H_1+H_2+H_3) \ar[d]^{\iota^*} \ar[rr]^{\sim}_{T} && K_{j+n}\left({CT}(Y_{H_2},q^*(H_3))_\sigma\right) \ar[d]^\partial \\ K^j(X\times \mathbb T^{n-1},\iota^*H_1+\iota^*H_2+H_3) \ar[rr]^{\sim}_{T_a} && K_{j+n-1}\left({CT}(Y_{\iota^*H_2},q_a^*(H_3))_{\iota^*\sigma}\right) }commutes, where is noncommutative T-duality with respect to and is the induced restriction map in twisted -theory. Thus T-duality trivialises the bulk-boundary correspondence in this parametrised context. This is posed as a general expectation for the construction described; no resolution is supplied in the source.
References
Primary source
Keith Hannabuss, Varghese Mathai and Guo Chuan Thiang, “T-duality trivializes bulk-boundary correspondence: the parametrised case”, arXiv:1510.04785 (2015).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.