Parametrised T-duality trivialisation conjecture for the bulk-boundary correspondence
Parametrised T-duality trivialisation conjecture for the bulk-boundary correspondence
Let be the parameter space, let , , and be the twisting components on , and write for the principal -bundle over with Chern class , with projection and parametrised deformation determined by . Choose a subgroup decomposition , let be the inclusion, and let , , and denote the corresponding restricted data. The bulk-boundary map is the Pimsner–Voiculescu boundary map
Parametrised T-duality trivialisation conjecture. The diagram
\xymatrix{ K^j(X\times \mathbb T^n,H_1+H_2+H_3) \ar[d]^{\iota^*} \ar[rr]^{\sim}_{T} && K_{j+n}\left({CT}(Y_{H_2},q^*(H_3))_\sigma\right) \ar[d]^\partial \\ K^j(X\times \mathbb T^{n-1},\iota^*H_1+\iota^*H_2+H_3) \ar[rr]^{\sim}_{T_a} && K_{j+n-1}\left({CT}(Y_{\iota^*H_2},q_a^*(H_3))_{\iota^*\sigma}\right) }commutes, where is noncommutative T-duality with respect to and is the induced restriction map in twisted -theory. Thus T-duality trivialises the bulk-boundary correspondence in this parametrised context. This is posed as a general expectation for the construction described; no resolution is supplied in the source.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Keith Hannabuss, Varghese Mathai and Guo Chuan Thiang, “T-duality trivializes bulk-boundary correspondence: the parametrised case”, arXiv:1510.04785 (2015).
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.