Local Lindelöf hypothesis for Whittaker newforms

Let π\pi be the representation under consideration, with central character ωπ\omega_\pi of conductor exponent a(ωπ)a(\omega_\pi), and let n1n_1 and m1m_1 be the parameters used in the paper, so that a(ωπ)n1a(\omega_\pi)\leq n_1 is equivalent to m1=0m_1=0. Let GG be the relevant group and WπW_\pi the Whittaker newform. Local Lindelöf hypothesis for Whittaker newforms. If

a(ωπ)n1(equivalently, m1=0),a(\omega_\pi)\leq n_1 \quad\text{(equivalently, }m_1=0\text{)},

then

1supgGWπ(g)εqnε.1\ll \sup_{g\in G}\lvert W_\pi(g)\rvert\ll_\varepsilon q^{n\varepsilon}.

This conjecture predicts a near-uniform upper bound for the sup norm of the Whittaker newform when the central character has sufficiently small conductor; the supplied excerpt does not indicate whether it has been resolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Abhishek Saha, “Hybrid sup-norm bounds for Maass newforms of powerful level”, arXiv:1509.07489 (2017).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2014–2015). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1412.5570.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.