Conjecture on the cosocle construction for simple cyclotomic KLR modules

About 11 years old · traced to

Let A∈Rep⁡(Λi)A\in\operatorname{Rep}({}^{\Lambda_i}) be a simple R(ν)R(\nu)-module with ∣ν∣≥1|\nu|\geq 1, where ii is not a forbidden element of II. Let pp be a cyclotomic path and let k=r(A)k=r(A) be minimal such that R(A)=e~p;k∨A\mathcal{R}(A)={\widetilde{e}^\vee_{p;k}}A is a simple R(ν−γp;k)R(\nu-\gamma_{p;k})-module in Rep⁡(Λp(−1))\operatorname{Rep}({}^{\Lambda_{p(-1)}}); write Tp;kT_{p;k} for the corresponding module constructed from the path.

Cosocle construction conjecture. Under the same hypotheses as the existence theorem,

A≅cosoc⁡pr⁡ΛiInd⁡(Tp;k)⊠R(A).A\cong\operatorname{cosoc}\operatorname{pr}_{\Lambda_i}\operatorname{Ind}(T_{p;k})\boxtimes\mathcal{R}(A).

This conjecture strengthens the existence theorem's surjection by asserting that the simple module AA is precisely the cosocle of the induced and projected tensor product. It concerns the proposed categorification of the tensor product of the Kirillov–Reshetikhin crystal B1,1B^{1,1} with a fundamental crystal; no resolution is given in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Henry Kvinge and Monica Vazirani, “Categorifying the tensor product of the Kirillov-Reshetikhin crystal B^1,1 and a fundamental crystal”, arXiv:1508.04182 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.