Ingleton's obstruction excluded-minor conjecture for base-orderability

Let Δ\Delta be a critical graph, let PP and QQ be the sets used to define the cyclic-flat lattice ZΔP,Q\mathcal{Z}_\Delta^{P,Q}, and let M(Δ)M(\Delta) be the matroid with lattice of cyclic flats equal to ZΔP,Q\mathcal{Z}_\Delta^{P,Q}. An obstruction is the configuration defined in the source's preceding construction.

Obstruction excluded-minor conjecture. If Δ\Delta has an obstruction, then M(Δ)M(\Delta) is an excluded minor for BO\mathcal{BO}.

The authors state this conjecture cautiously because Ingleton did not specify the construction of M(Δ)M(\Delta) when Δ\Delta has an obstruction, and they cannot be certain that this is the matroid he intended. The assertion remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Joseph E. Bonin and Thomas J. Savitsky, “An infinite family of excluded minors for strong base-orderability”, arXiv:1507.05521 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.