The multilinear Hilbert transform boundedness conjecture

For a natural number kk and test functions f1,,fk:RCf_1,\dots,f_k:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{C}, define the kk-linear Hilbert transform by

Hk(f1,,fk)(x):=p.v.Rf1(x+t)fk(x+kt)dtt.H_k(f_1,\dots,f_k)(x):=\operatorname{p.v.}\int_{\mathbb{R}}f_1(x+t)\dots f_k(x+kt)\frac{dt}{t}.

Multilinear Hilbert transform boundedness conjecture. For k1k\geq 1 and exponents 1<p1,,pk,p<1<p_1,\dots,p_k,p<\infty satisfying 1p=1p1++1pk\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_1}+\dots+\frac{1}{p_k}, the truncated transforms Hk,r,RH_{k,r,R} should satisfy

Hk,r,R(f1,,fk)Lp(R)Ck,p,p1,,pki=1kfiLpi(R),\lVert H_{k,r,R}(f_1,\dots,f_k)\rVert_{L^p(\mathbb{R})}\leq C_{k,p,p_1,\dots,p_k}\prod_{i=1}^k\lVert f_i\rVert_{L^{p_i}(\mathbb{R})},

for fiLpi(R)f_i\in L^{p_i}(\mathbb{R}) and 0<r<R0<r<R, with Ck,p,p1,,pkC_{k,p,p_1,\dots,p_k} independent of r,Rr,R; consequently, the same bound holds for HkH_k on test functions. This conjecture extends the classical and bilinear Hilbert transform estimates. It is proven for k=1,2k=1,2, but remains open for larger kk.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Terence Tao, “Cancellation for the multilinear Hilbert transform”, arXiv:1505.06479 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.