The frame-completeness conjecture for the class of all interpretability frames

Let F\mathfrak F be a class of IL{\textup{\textbf{IL}}}-frames, and define

IL[F]={AFF valuationV F,VA}.{\textup{\textbf{IL}}}[\mathfrak F]=\{A\mid \forall F\in\mathfrak F\ \forall^{\sf valuation}V\ \langle F,V\rangle\models A\}.

Let All\mathfrak{All} be the class of frames in which every SS-relation implication that follows both from the ILM{\textup{\textbf{IL}}{\sf{M}}} and ILP{\textup{\textbf{IL}}{\sf{P}}} frame conditions is present. The frame-completeness conjecture.

IL(All)=IL[All].{\textup{\textbf{IL}}({\rm All})}={\textup{\textbf{IL}}}[\mathfrak{All}].

This conjecture asks whether the core interpretability logic is exactly the logic determined by the class All\mathfrak{All}; the supplied text presents it as a new conjecture and gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Evan Goris and Joost J. Joosten, “Two series of formalized interpretability principles for weak systems of arithmetic”, arXiv:1503.09130 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.