Minimal-energy equality conjecture for three, four and five partitions of the square torus

Let T(1,1)\mathsf{T}(1,1) be the square flat torus. Let H3(1)\mathsf{H}_3(1) and H4(1)\mathsf{H}_4(1) be the hexagonal tiling domains appearing in Proposition 1, and let Q\mathsf Q be the square of side 1/51/\sqrt{5} used as the tiling domain of a 55-partition. The proposition gives

L3(T(1,1))λ1(H3(1)),L4(T(1,1))λ1(H4(1)),\mathfrak{L}_3(\mathsf{T}(1,1))\leq\lambda_1(\mathsf{H}_3(1)),\qquad \mathfrak{L}_4(\mathsf{T}(1,1))\leq\lambda_1(\mathsf{H}_4(1)),

and

L5(T(1,1))λ1(Q)=10π2.\mathfrak{L}_5(\mathsf{T}(1,1))\leq\lambda_1(\mathsf Q)=10\pi^2.

Minimal-energy equality conjecture. The three inequalities in Proposition 1 are equalities.

If true, these candidates would give the exact minimal energies for 33-, 44- and 55-partitions of the square torus. The statement is presented as a conjecture, with only the displayed upper bounds established in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Virginie Bonnaillie-Noël and Corentin Léna, “Spectral minimal partitions for a family of tori”, arXiv:1503.04545 (2016).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.