Choice-independence of higher specialization for mixed Tate motives

Let D(X,J)D(X,J) be the higher deformation associated with a simple normal-crossings stratum YJY_J and let D0(X,J)D^0(X,J) be its open deformation. Successive specialization along the A1\mathbb{A}^1 factors yields a functor on mixed Tate motives, while specialization along the diagonal yields the corresponding diagonal construction. Choice-independence conjecture. The successive specialization procedure does not depend on the choices when restricted to mixed Tate motive categories, and it agrees with the construction using the diagonal. This would establish that the higher specialization formalism is canonical in the mixed Tate setting, although the source gives no resolution of the claim.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ismael Soudères, “A Motivic Grothendieck-Teichmüller Group”, arXiv:1502.05640 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.