The folklore conjecture on quasi-modularity for Calabi–Yau 1-folds

Let Xr\mathcal{X}_r be a Calabi–Yau 1-fold, and let ϕ1,,ϕn\phi_1,\ldots,\phi_n be insertions with nonnegative integers k1,,knk_1,\ldots,k_n. Define the ancestor Gromov–Witten correlation function by

 ⁣ϕ1ψ1k1,,ϕnψnkn ⁣g,n:=d0ϕ1ψ1k1,,ϕnψnkng,n,dqd.\langle\!\langle \phi_1\psi_1^{k_1},\ldots,\phi_n\psi_n^{k_n}\rangle\!\rangle_{g,n}:=\sum_{d\geq 0}\langle \phi_1\psi_1^{k_1},\ldots,\phi_n\psi_n^{k_n}\rangle_{g,n,d}q^d.

Calabi–Yau 1-fold quasi-modularity conjecture. The ancestor Gromov–Witten correlation functions defined above are quasi-modular forms. This is the one-dimensional formulation of the broader folklore expectation; the paper studies cases in which such quasi-modularity leads to Ramanujan-type differential identities, while the general assertion remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yefeng Shen and Jie Zhou, “Ramanujan Identities and Quasi-Modularity in Gromov-Witten Theory”, arXiv:1411.2078 (2017).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.