Type II distribution conjecture

Let 0<ϖ<1/40<\varpi<1/4, and let δ>0\delta>0 be a sufficiently small fixed quantity depending on ϑ\vartheta. Let xx tend to infinity, let PP be a square-free number all of whose prime factors are at most xδx^\delta, and let N,MN,M satisfy

x1/22ϖNMx1/2+2ϖ,NMx.x^{1/2-2\varpi}\ll N\ll M\ll x^{1/2+2\varpi},\qquad NM\asymp x.

Let α,β ⁣:NR\alpha,\beta\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R} be supported on [M,2M][M,2M] and [N,2N][N,2N], respectively, with α(n)1|\alpha(n)|\ll1, and set β=1[N,2N]\beta=1_{[N,2N]}. Type II conjecture. For any fixed A>0A>0,

sup1ax:(a,P)=1rx1/2+2ϖ:rPΔ(αβ;a (r))xlogAx.\sup_{1\leq a\leq x:(a,P)=1}\sum_{r\ll x^{1/2+2\varpi}:r\mid P}\left|\Delta(\alpha\star\beta;a\ (r))\right|\ll x\log^{-A}x.

This conjecture is introduced as an alternative distributional hypothesis: partial progress toward it would yield partial progress on Vinogradov's least quadratic nonresidue conjecture. The supplied material does not give a resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Terence Tao, “The Elliott-Halberstam conjecture implies the Vinogradov least quadratic nonresidue conjecture”, arXiv:1410.7073 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.