The Landau–Ginzburg/Calabi–Yau correspondence for (Q,G)(Q,G)

Let (Q,G)(Q,G) be an LG pair, let Z={Q=0}P(G)\mathcal{Z}=\{Q=0\}\subset\mathbb{P}(G) be the associated Calabi–Yau variety, and let L(Q,G)V(Q,G)\mathscr{L}^{(Q,G)}\subset\mathscr{V}^{(Q,G)} and LZVZ\mathscr{L}^{\mathcal{Z}}\subset\mathscr{V}^{\mathcal{Z}} be the genus-zero FJRW and Gromov–Witten Lagrangian cones, respectively. The Landau–Ginzburg/Calabi–Yau correspondence. There exists a symplectic transformation

V:V(Q,G)VZ\mathbb{V}:\mathscr{V}^{(Q,G)}\to\mathscr{V}^{\mathcal{Z}}

which identifies L(Q,G)\mathscr{L}^{(Q,G)} with the analytic continuation of LZ\mathscr{L}^{\mathcal{Z}}. This is the genus-zero form of the LG/CY correspondence; the source states it as a conjectural analogue of the crepant transformation conjecture and gives no resolution in the quoted passage.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Nathan Priddis, Y. -P. Lee and Mark Shoemaker, “A proof of the Landau-Ginzburg/Calabi-Yau correspondence via the crepant transformation conjecture”, arXiv:1410.5503 (2014).

Additional references

3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2007–2014). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1405.6352, arXiv:0712.4021.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.