The conjecture that slower-than- convergence invalidates Prandtl theory
The conjecture that slower-than- convergence invalidates Prandtl theory
Let solve the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations with viscosity , and let denote the corresponding Euler solution. Suppose the vanishing viscosity limit holds in (), with convergence rate described by , and interpret “slower than ” as a rate asymptotically worse than . Conjecture. If the vanishing viscosity limit in () holds at a rate slower than in two dimensions, then Prandtl theory fails. The conjecture concerns the relationship between the convergence rate in the vanishing viscosity limit and the validity of Prandtl boundary-layer theory; the surrounding discussion argues that slower convergence places the matching between the Navier–Stokes and Euler solutions outside the Prandtl layer.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
James P. Kelliher, “Observations on the vanishing viscosity limit”, arXiv:1409.7716 (2014).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.