The conjecture that slower-than- convergence invalidates Prandtl theory
Let solve the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations with viscosity , and let denote the corresponding Euler solution. Suppose the vanishing viscosity limit holds in (), with convergence rate described by , and interpret “slower than ” as a rate asymptotically worse than . Conjecture. If the vanishing viscosity limit in () holds at a rate slower than in two dimensions, then Prandtl theory fails. The conjecture concerns the relationship between the convergence rate in the vanishing viscosity limit and the validity of Prandtl boundary-layer theory; the surrounding discussion argues that slower convergence places the matching between the Navier–Stokes and Euler solutions outside the Prandtl layer.
References
Primary source
James P. Kelliher, “Observations on the vanishing viscosity limit”, arXiv:1409.7716 (2014).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.