Euler–Poincaré–Dirac index conjecture for Harish-Chandra modules

Let K~\widetilde K be the spin cover of a maximal compact subgroup KK, and let IDir(X)\mathsf{I}_{\mathrm{Dir}}(X) denote the Dirac index of a finite-length Harish-Chandra module XX. Write [ ]K~[\,\ ]_{\widetilde K} for the usual pairing of virtual finite-dimensional representations of K~\widetilde K, and let X,YDir=[IDir(X),IDir(Y)]K~\langle X,Y\rangle_{\mathrm{Dir}}=[\mathsf{I}_{\mathrm{Dir}}(X),\mathsf{I}_{\mathrm{Dir}}(Y)]_{\widetilde K} be the Dirac pairing. Euler–Poincaré–Dirac index conjecture. For any finite-length Harish-Chandra modules XX and YY with infinitesimal character,

EP(X,Y)=[IDir(X),IDir(Y)]K~=X,YDir.\mathbf{EP}(X,Y)=[\mathsf{I}_{\mathrm{Dir}}(X),\mathsf{I}_{\mathrm{Dir}}(Y)]_{\widetilde K}=\langle X,Y\rangle_{\mathrm{Dir}}.

The conjecture arises because the formal Euler–Poincaré computation uses potentially infinite-dimensional Hom spaces, so the equality of the two extreme terms is not justified. Its content is that the Euler–Poincaré pairing factors through Dirac indices, and hence through Dirac cohomology.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

David Renard, “Euler-Poincaré pairing, Dirac index and elliptic pairing for Harish-Chandra modules”, arXiv:1409.4166 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.