The absolute continuity dichotomy for factorization measures

Fix a permutation pp and write σ(p,w)(eiθ)=eiΣ(θ)\sigma(p,w)(e^{i\theta})=e^{i\Sigma(\theta)}, where Σ\Sigma is the associated nondecreasing lift. Let dΣ/(2π)=Σ(θ)dθ/(2π)+μsd\Sigma/(2\pi)=\Sigma'(\theta)d\theta/(2\pi)+\mu_s be its decomposition into absolutely continuous and singular parts, and let l2l^2 be the space of square-summable parameter sequences. The absolute continuity dichotomy conjecture. (a) If wl2n=1Δw\in l^2\cap\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}\Delta, then

Σ(θ)=(n=1(1wn2))exp(2n=0Re(log(1+wnσn1(z)n))),\Sigma'(\theta)=\left(\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}(1-|w_n|^2)\right)\exp\left(-2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\operatorname{Re}\left(\log(1+w_{n'}\sigma_{n-1}(z)^{n'})\right)\right),

where the partial sums converge in L2(dΣ)L^2(d\Sigma). (b) If wl2w\in l^2, then Σ>0\Sigma'>0 almost everywhere with respect to dθd\theta. (c) If wl2w\notin l^2, then Σ=0\Sigma'=0 almost everywhere with respect to dθd\theta, equivalently dΣdθd\Sigma\perp d\theta. The claim is intended to distinguish absolutely continuous and singular behavior of the limiting factorization map; the source gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Mark Dalthorp and Doug Pickrell, “Homeomorphism of S^1 and Factorization”, arXiv:1408.5402 (2019).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.