Unmarked-boundary-loop diameter growth conjecture for modular flip-graphs

At least 11 years old · documented by

Let Σ\Sigma be a surface with unmarked and marked boundary loops, and let Σn\Sigma_n denote the corresponding surface in the family with nn marked points. For a surface with kεk_\varepsilon unmarked boundary non-privileged loops, write diam⁡(MF(Σn))\operatorname{diam}({\mathcal M \mathcal F}(\Sigma_n)) for the diameter of its modular flip-graph.

Unmarked-loop diameter growth conjecture. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there exists kεk_\varepsilon such that, if Σ\Sigma is a surface with kεk_\varepsilon unmarked boundary non-privileged loops, then

lim⁡n→∞diam⁡(MF(Σn))n≥3−ε.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\operatorname{diam}({\mathcal M \mathcal F}(\Sigma_n))}{n}\geq 3-\varepsilon.

This is the unmarked-boundary analogue of the preceding conjecture and predicts a lower asymptotic diameter growth rate after sufficiently many such loops are added. The source provides no resolution, so the conjecture remains open.

References

Primary source

Hugo Parlier and Lionel Pournin, “Flip-graph moduli spaces of filling surfaces”, arXiv:1407.1516 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.