Unmarked-boundary-loop diameter growth conjecture for modular flip-graphs

Let Σ\Sigma be a surface with unmarked and marked boundary loops, and let Σn\Sigma_n denote the corresponding surface in the family with nn marked points. For a surface with kεk_\varepsilon unmarked boundary non-privileged loops, write diam(MF(Σn))\operatorname{diam}({\mathcal M \mathcal F}(\Sigma_n)) for the diameter of its modular flip-graph.

Unmarked-loop diameter growth conjecture. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there exists kεk_\varepsilon such that, if Σ\Sigma is a surface with kεk_\varepsilon unmarked boundary non-privileged loops, then

limndiam(MF(Σn))n3ε.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\operatorname{diam}({\mathcal M \mathcal F}(\Sigma_n))}{n}\geq 3-\varepsilon.

This is the unmarked-boundary analogue of the preceding conjecture and predicts a lower asymptotic diameter growth rate after sufficiently many such loops are added. The source provides no resolution, so the conjecture remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hugo Parlier and Lionel Pournin, “Flip-graph moduli spaces of filling surfaces”, arXiv:1407.1516 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.