Stronger Ihara's lemma for unitary groups

Let GG, F+F^+, FF, TT, SS_{\ell}, S(B)S(B), UvU^v, Sa,{ρx},S_{a,\{\rho_x\},\varnothing}, and kˉ\bar{k} have the meanings used in the paper. Let a maximal ideal be non-Eisenstein when its associated residual representation rˉm\bar{r}_{\mathfrak m} is absolutely irreducible. Stronger Ihara's lemma. Let UG(AF+)U\subset G(\mathbb A_{F^+}^{\infty}) be sufficiently small, let vT(SS(B))v\in T-(S_{\ell}\cup S(B)) be split in FF with no restriction on UvU_v, and let mTa,{ρx},T(U)\mathfrak m\subset\mathbb T_{a,\{\rho_x\},\varnothing}^T(U) be non-Eisenstein. Then every irreducible kˉ[G(Fv+)]\bar{k}[G(F_v^+)]-submodule

πSa,{ρx},(Uv,kˉ)m\pi\subset S_{a,\{\rho_x\},\varnothing}(U^v,\bar{k})_{\mathfrak m}

is generic. This strengthens the preceding Ihara-lemma assertion by removing the cyclic-submodule and spherical-eigenform hypotheses; the source says it is not needed for the argument and records it as a stronger conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Claus Sorensen, “The local Langlands correspondence in families and Ihara's lemma for U(n)”, arXiv:1406.1830 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.