Let P,P′⊂G be standard parabolic subgroups with standard Levi subgroups L⊂P and L′⊂P′, and let π and π′ be supersingular representations of L(F) and L′(F) over kE, respectively. Assume that IndP−(F)G(F)π and IndP′−(F)G(F)π′ are irreducible. For α∈ΔL⊥, let πα denote the twist of π by the action of sα, and let ω:F×→kE× be the mod-p cyclotomic character. The extension conjecture. The following assertions hold: (i) if P′⊂P and P⊂P′, then
ExtG(F)1(IndP′−(F)G(F)π′,IndP−(F)G(F)π)=0;
(ii) if F=Qp, P′=P, and the central characters of π and π′ are distinct, then
dimkEExtG(Qp)1(IndP−(Qp)G(Qp)π′,IndP−(Qp)G(Qp)π)=card{α∈ΔL⊥∣π′≅πα⊗(ω−1∘α)};
(iii) if P′⊂P, parabolic induction from P− induces an isomorphism
ExtL(F)1(Ind(P′−∩L)(F)L(F)π′,π)⟶∼ExtG(F)1(IndP′−(F)G(F)π′,IndP−(F)G(F)π);
and (iv) if P⊂P′, induction from P′− induces an isomorphism
ExtL′(F)1(π′,Ind(P−∩L′)(F)L′(F)π)⟶∼ExtG(F)1(IndP′−(F)G(F)π′,IndP−(F)G(F)π).
The conjecture describes extensions between irreducible parabolic inductions from supersingular Levi representations and was suggested by Breuil for G=GLn. The source states that parts of the conjecture are proved in specified cases, but does not establish the full four-part statement.