The regularity conjecture for H(I,I+2)H(I,I+2)

About 12 years old · traced to

Let H(I,J)H(I,J) be the least positive integer nn such that there exist II disjoint Golomb rulers, each a JJ-subset of 1,2,…,n\\{1,2,\ldots,n\\}. Regularity conjecture. For every integer I≥8I\geq8,

H(I,I+2)=I(I+2).H(I,I+2)=I(I+2).

Thus the conjecture predicts regular disjoint Golomb rulers in this parameter range. The paper reports that the assertion has been confirmed computationally for I∈8,…,150I\in\\{8,\ldots,150\\}, but treats the unrestricted statement as conjectural.

Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Regularity conjecture for H(I,I+2)H(I,I+2)

    For positive integers II and JJ, let H(I,J)H(I,J) be the least nn for which there are II disjoint JJ-mark Golomb rulers in {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}. Regularity conjecture for H(I,I+2)H(I,I+2). For every integer I≥4I\geq4,

    H(I,I+2)=I(I+2).H(I,I+2)=I(I+2).

    The source reports that this is known for I∈{4,5,6,7}I\in\{4,5,6,7\} from results of Kløve and Shearer, while the general assertion remains open.

    source: Xiaodong Xu, Baoxin Xiu, Changjun Fan and Meilian Liang, “Some constructive results on Disjoint Golomb Rulers”, arXiv:2409.14409 (2024).

References

Primary source

Xiu Baoxin, Changjun Fan and Meilian Liang, “On Disjoint Golomb Rulers”, arXiv:1405.4535 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.