Meromorphicity of the (2,2)(2,2) theta lift for non-isotropic lattices

At least 11 years old · documented by

Let LL be a signature (2,2)(2,2) lattice with no isotropic vectors, let KR+iC≅H×HK_{\mathbb{R}}+iC\cong\mathcal{H}\times\mathcal{H} be the associated domain, and let im2ΦL,m,m,0\frac{i^{m}}{2}\Phi_{L,m,m,0} be the weight mm automorphic form. Let Rm(2)R_{m}^{(2)} be the weight-raising operator.

Non-isotropic (2,2)(2,2) meromorphicity conjecture. The image of im2ΦL,m,m,0\frac{i^{m}}{2}\Phi_{L,m,m,0} under 1−4π2Rm(2)\frac{1}{-4\pi^{2}}R_{m}^{(2)}, namely δm,τδm,σ−2π2\frac{\delta_{m,\tau}\delta_{m,\sigma}}{-2\pi^{2}}, is meromorphic, with the singularities given in Theorem Rmb-2Phimer, also when LL contains no isotropic vectors.

The result for b−=1b_{-}=1 is independent of isotropic vectors, while the Fourier-expansion argument used for general b−b_{-} requires them. Meyer's theorem leaves precisely this b−=2b_{-}=2 non-isotropic case as the unresolved case addressed by the conjecture.

References

Primary source

Shaul Zemel, “Weight Changing Operators for Automorphic Forms on Grassmannians and Differential Properties of Certain Theta Lifts”, arXiv:1403.3567 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.