Meromorphicity of the theta lift for non-isotropic lattices
Let be a signature lattice with no isotropic vectors, let be the associated domain, and let be the weight automorphic form. Let be the weight-raising operator.
Non-isotropic meromorphicity conjecture. The image of under , namely , is meromorphic, with the singularities given in Theorem Rmb-2Phimer, also when contains no isotropic vectors.
The result for is independent of isotropic vectors, while the Fourier-expansion argument used for general requires them. Meyer's theorem leaves precisely this non-isotropic case as the unresolved case addressed by the conjecture.
References
Primary source
Shaul Zemel, “Weight Changing Operators for Automorphic Forms on Grassmannians and Differential Properties of Certain Theta Lifts”, arXiv:1403.3567 (2020).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.