Meromorphicity of the (2,2)(2,2) theta lift for non-isotropic lattices

Let LL be a signature (2,2)(2,2) lattice with no isotropic vectors, let KR+iCH×HK_{\mathbb{R}}+iC\cong\mathcal{H}\times\mathcal{H} be the associated domain, and let im2ΦL,m,m,0\frac{i^{m}}{2}\Phi_{L,m,m,0} be the weight mm automorphic form. Let Rm(2)R_{m}^{(2)} be the weight-raising operator.

Non-isotropic (2,2)(2,2) meromorphicity conjecture. The image of im2ΦL,m,m,0\frac{i^{m}}{2}\Phi_{L,m,m,0} under 14π2Rm(2)\frac{1}{-4\pi^{2}}R_{m}^{(2)}, namely δm,τδm,σ2π2\frac{\delta_{m,\tau}\delta_{m,\sigma}}{-2\pi^{2}}, is meromorphic, with the singularities given in Theorem Rmb-2Phimer, also when LL contains no isotropic vectors.

The result for b=1b_{-}=1 is independent of isotropic vectors, while the Fourier-expansion argument used for general bb_{-} requires them. Meyer's theorem leaves precisely this b=2b_{-}=2 non-isotropic case as the unresolved case addressed by the conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Shaul Zemel, “Weight Changing Operators for Automorphic Forms on Grassmannians and Differential Properties of Certain Theta Lifts”, arXiv:1403.3567 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.