Mirkovic–Vilonen cycle and affine-paving conjecture for truncated affine Grassmannians

About 12 years old · traced to

Let GG be the group under consideration, let X\mathscr{X} be its affine Grassmannian, and for x∈Xx\in\mathscr{X} let Ec(x)\mathrm{Ec}(x) be the associated convex polytope. Define

X(Ec(x)):={y∈X∣Ec(y)⊂Ec(x), νG(y)=νG(x)}.\mathscr{X}(\mathrm{Ec}(x)):=\{y\in\mathscr{X}\mid \mathrm{Ec}(y)\subset\mathrm{Ec}(x),\ \nu_{G}(y)=\nu_{G}(x)\}.

Let WW be the Weyl group of GG, and let a Mirkovic–Vilonen cycle mean one of the cycles arising from the geometric Satake construction.

Mirkovic–Vilonen cycle and affine-paving conjecture. For every x∈Xx\in\mathscr{X}, there exists w∈Ww\in W such that w⋅X(Ec(x))w\cdot\mathscr{X}(\mathrm{Ec}(x)) is a Mirkovic–Vilonen cycle. Moreover, the truncated affine Grassmannian X(Ec(x))\mathscr{X}(\mathrm{Ec}(x)) admits an affine paving and hence is cohomologically pure.

The conjecture is motivated by Lusztig parametrization and the theory of Mirkovic–Vilonen cycles. The paper proves the relevant assertion in the GL3\mathrm{GL}_{3} setting, while the general claim is open.

References

Primary source

Zongbin Chen, “Truncated affine grassmannians and truncated affine Springer fibers for GL_3”, arXiv:1401.1930 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.