Noncommutative Kato distinguished-triangle conjecture

About 13 years old · traced to

Let A∙A^{\bullet} be a DG algebra over Z\mathbb{Z}. Let CP∙D(A∙⊗C)ιCP^{\mathcal{D}}_{\bullet}(A^{\bullet}\otimes\mathbb{C})^\iota be its Deligne-type periodic cyclic complex with involution, and define

K∙′(A∙)R=(K∙(Cpspf(A∙))⊗R)∗.K'_{\bullet}(A^{\bullet})_{\mathbb{R}}=\left(K_{\bullet}(C^{\mathrm{pspf}}(A^{\bullet}))\otimes\mathbb{R}\right)^*.

The regulator and dual regulator are maps from algebraic KK-theory through this complex.

Noncommutative distinguished-triangle conjecture. There is a natural distinguished triangle

K∙(A∙)⊗R→rCP∙D(A∙⊗C)ι→r∗K∙′(A∙)R[1]⟶K^{\bullet}(A^{\bullet})\otimes\mathbb{R}\xrightarrow{r}CP^{\mathcal{D}}_{\bullet}(A^{\bullet}\otimes\mathbb{C})^\iota\xrightarrow{r^*}K'_{\bullet}(A^{\bullet})_{\mathbb{R}}[1]\longrightarrow

where rr and r∗r^* are the regulator and dual regulator maps.

This is the proposed noncommutative analogue of the distinguished triangle for varieties, using periodic cyclic homology and the dual of algebraic KK-theory. The source gives no resolution of the assertion.

References

Primary source

D. Kaledin, “Beilinson conjecture for finite-dimensional associative algebras”, arXiv:1312.4069 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.