Gain-tightness characterization for symmetric sphere frameworks with horizontal or improper rotational symmetry

Let S\mathcal{S} denote the sphere. For a SS-symmetric framework, let SS be either the group Cmh\mathcal{C}_{mh} with mm even or the group S2m\mathcal{S}_{2m} with mm odd. Let (G,p)(G,p) be an SS-generic realisation on S\mathcal{S}, and let (G0,ψ)(G_0,\psi) be its quotient SS-gain graph. A gain graph is (2,3,1)i(2,3,1)^i-gain-tight when it is (2,3,1)i(2,3,1)^i-gain-sparse and has F=2V(F)1|F|=2|V(F)|-1 for its full edge set, where the sparsity bounds are F2V(F)3|F|\leq 2|V(F)|-3 when a nonempty edge set FF has vertex-generated subgroup C1\mathcal{C}_1 or Ci\mathcal{C}_i, and F2V(F)1|F|\leq 2|V(F)|-1 otherwise. The sphere gain-tightness conjecture. The framework (G,p)(G,p) is SS-isostatic if and only if (G0,ψ)(G_0,\psi) is (2,3,1)i(2,3,1)^i-gain-tight. This would complete the sphere characterizations for the remaining groups Cmh\mathcal{C}_{mh} with even mm and S2m\mathcal{S}_{2m} with odd mm; the source presents these cases as conjectural, while the analogous cases listed in the surrounding summary are established by the cited theorems.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Anthony Nixon and Bernd Schulze, “Symmetry-forced rigidity of frameworks on surfaces”, arXiv:1312.1480 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.