Gain-tightness characterization for symmetric sphere frameworks with horizontal or improper rotational symmetry

About 13 years old · traced to

Let S\mathcal{S} denote the sphere. For a SS-symmetric framework, let SS be either the group Cmh\mathcal{C}_{mh} with mm even or the group S2m\mathcal{S}_{2m} with mm odd. Let (G,p)(G,p) be an SS-generic realisation on S\mathcal{S}, and let (G0,ψ)(G_0,\psi) be its quotient SS-gain graph. A gain graph is (2,3,1)i(2,3,1)^i-gain-tight when it is (2,3,1)i(2,3,1)^i-gain-sparse and has ∣F∣=2∣V(F)∣−1|F|=2|V(F)|-1 for its full edge set, where the sparsity bounds are ∣F∣≤2∣V(F)∣−3|F|\leq 2|V(F)|-3 when a nonempty edge set FF has vertex-generated subgroup C1\mathcal{C}_1 or Ci\mathcal{C}_i, and ∣F∣≤2∣V(F)∣−1|F|\leq 2|V(F)|-1 otherwise. The sphere gain-tightness conjecture. The framework (G,p)(G,p) is SS-isostatic if and only if (G0,ψ)(G_0,\psi) is (2,3,1)i(2,3,1)^i-gain-tight. This would complete the sphere characterizations for the remaining groups Cmh\mathcal{C}_{mh} with even mm and S2m\mathcal{S}_{2m} with odd mm; the source presents these cases as conjectural, while the analogous cases listed in the surrounding summary are established by the cited theorems.

References

Primary source

Anthony Nixon and Bernd Schulze, “Symmetry-forced rigidity of frameworks on surfaces”, arXiv:1312.1480 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.