Thickness bounds imply recursively bounded refinement complexity

Let KnK^n be a simplicial complex, let ϵ\epsilon be positive, and let B1dRdB^d_1\subset\mathbb{R}^d denote the unit ball. A piecewise smooth embedding of KnK^n into Rd\mathbb{R}^d has thickness ϵ\epsilon when it satisfies the paper's thickness condition. Thickness–refinement conjecture. If KnK^n admits a piecewise smooth embedding of thickness ϵ\epsilon into Rd\mathbb{R}^d, more specifically into B1dRdB^d_1\subset\mathbb{R}^d, then

rc(K)<r(ϵ),\operatorname{rc}(K)<r(\epsilon),

where rr is a recursively computable function of ϵ\epsilon. This technical conjecture would connect geometric thickness with refinement complexity and is intended to support a thickness analogue of the non-recursive refinement-complexity theorem. The paper notes that proving it is technically difficult because its minimal thickness definition does not control the proximity of adjacent simplices.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Michael Freedman and Vyacheslav Krushkal, “Geometric complexity of embeddings in R^d”, arXiv:1311.2667 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.