Failure of Benford behavior for polynomial, exponential, and Fibonacci stopping sequences

Fix a monotonically increasing sequence {an}\{a_n\}. In the additive decomposition process, a stick whose length belongs to {an}\{a_n\} does not decompose further; sticks of length 11 also stop decomposing. Non-Benford decomposition conjecture. The process is not Benford if {an}\{a_n\} is any of

{n2},{2n},{Fn},\{n^2\},\qquad \{2^n\},\qquad \{F_n\},

where FnF_n is the nnth Fibonacci number. Together with the positive examples for even and prime stopping sequences, this identifies classes of stopping sequences expected to produce or prevent Benford behavior; the supplied text does not state a proof or resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Thealexa Becker, David Burt, Taylor C. Corcoran, Alec Greaves-Tunnell, Joseph R. Iafrate, Joy Jing, Steven J. Miller, Jaclyn D. Porfilio, Ryan Ronan, Jirapat Samranvedhya, Frederick W. Strauch and Blaine Talbut, “Benford's Law and Continuous Dependent Random Variables”, arXiv:1309.5603 (2018).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.