The refinement-process obstruction to property (PM)
The refinement-process obstruction to property (PM)
Let and be the vectors appearing in property , and let denote a unit normal to a path in the refined mesh. Consider an open set , a subdomain , and a refinement process with meshes . Suppose that for every segment with unit normal , every , every , every , and every , there is an such that for all there \exists a continuous union of edges from satisfying
\begin{array}{l} \boldsymbol{\gamma}_n(0)\in V_0,\\ \boldsymbol{\gamma}_n(1)\in V_1,\\ \boldsymbol{\gamma}_n(t)\in V\text{ for all }t, e\text{and } \int_0^1\bigl\lvert\boldsymbol{n}\cdot\boldsymbol{n}(t)\bigr\rvert\,dt\geq1-\varepsilon, \bigl. \text{Then there exists no }(\boldsymbol{a},\boldsymbol{b})\text{ such that property }(PM)\text{ is true for any }h_n.The refinement-process obstruction to property (PM). Under the stated approximation condition, no fixed pair can make property hold throughout the refinement sequence. The condition expresses that mesh-edge normals can approximate the normal of every segment sufficiently well along paths joining the prescribed neighborhoods. This is presented as a sufficient condition, while the source explicitly says that it is not known whether a refinement process satisfying the condition exists.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Hervé Le Meur, “Optimization under second order constraints: are the finite element discretizations consistent ?”, arXiv:1309.1433 (2017).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.