Uniformity conjecture for period transfer when n is even
Uniformity conjecture for period transfer when n is even
Let be the quadratic extension, let , and let be a cuspidal representation of . For each , let be the inverse Jacquet–Langlands transfer to the corresponding inner form , and let be the associated subgroup. Uniformity conjecture. If is even, then for any ,
This is the proposed global “anti-dichotomy” principle: for even , distinction should be uniform across all inner forms for which the inverse transfer exists. The source presents it as a conjecture motivated by the relative trace formula and explicitly distinguishes it from, and notes that it is not implied by, the local statement.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Brooke Feigon, Kimball Martin and David Whitehouse, “Periods and nonvanishing of central L-values for GL(2n)”, arXiv:1308.2253 (2017).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.