Equivalence of metric regularity and strong metric regularity of the subdifferential

Let f ⁣:RnRf\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to\overline{\mathbb{R}} be both prox-regular and subdifferentially continuous at xˉ\bar{x} for xˉ=0\bar{x}^*=0, where xˉ\bar{x} is a local minimizer of ff. The subdifferential mapping f\partial f is metrically regular at (xˉ,xˉ)(\bar{x},\bar{x}^*) if and only if it is strongly metrically regular there.

Equivalence of metric regularity and strong metric regularity. Under these hypotheses, metric regularity and strong metric regularity of the subdifferential are the same notions.

For convex functions, for twice continuously differentiable functions, and for functions of the form f(x)=f0(x)+δΩ(x)f(x)=f_0(x)+\delta_\Omega(x) with f0f_0 twice continuously differentiable and Ω\Omega polyhedral convex, the equivalence is known; the conjecture concerns all prox-regular and subdifferentially continuous functions on finite-dimensional spaces.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

D. Drusvyatskiy, B. S. Mordukhovich and T. T. A. Nghia, “Second-order growth, tilt stability, and metric regularity of the subdifferential”, arXiv:1304.7385 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.