Quantum-connection identification for the Lagrangian Grassmannian Landau–Ginzburg model

From papers

Let X=LG(m)X=LG(m), let G0WtG_0^{W_t} be the Gauss–Manin module associated to WtW_t, and let Gˉ0Wt\bar G_0^{W_t} be the C[,et]\mathbb{C}[\hbar,e^t]-submodule generated by the classes [pλω][p_\lambda\omega], where λ\lambda runs through the strict partitions inside an m×mm\times m box. Let A{}^A\nabla and B{}^B\nabla be the AA- and BB-model connections defined in the paper.

Quantum-connection identification conjecture. The differential operators Bt\hbar\,{}^B\nabla_{\partial_t} and B\hbar\,{}^B\nabla_{\hbar\partial_\hbar} preserve Gˉ0Wt\bar G_0^{W_t}. Moreover, the assignment

σλ[pλω]\sigma^\lambda\longmapsto[p_\lambda\omega]

defines an isomorphism H(X,C[,et])Gˉ0WtH^*(X,\mathbb{C}[\hbar,e^t])\cong\bar G_0^{W_t} under which A{}^A\nabla is identified with B{}^B\nabla.

This is the precise form of the paper's mirror-symmetry claim: the quantum connection of LG(m)LG(m) is recovered from the Gauss–Manin connection of WtW_t. The supplied text gives no resolution status.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

C. Pech and K. Rietsch, “A Landau-Ginzburg model for Lagrangian Grassmannians, Langlands duality and relations in quantum cohomology”, arXiv:1304.4958 (2013).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.